The Daisy Awards

Great montage of the best and worst of the political ads from this season. Being in Utah we've missed some of the best...and the worst...but then doesn't that make them the best? I digress...

The Daisy Awards for Political Ads - Political Punch

...my personal favorite? The Carly Fiorina's "Demon Sheep" ad. Priceless

And here's the one that started it all...

Continuing on the Civility Theme

Interesting comments from former President Carter. Speaking of his campaigns back in the day the former President says; "It would have been devastating if any one of us had run a negative campaign against the other," Mr. Carter said, "whereas nowadays it's become a common practice and, unfortunately, it works for the American people."

And that's the sad state of public dialogue in America right now - it works.

Mr. Carter continued, "By the time you get to Washington, even if you are elected, your reputation has been severely damaged by the constant stream of negative TV commercials."

Just in case you've always wanted to get a Polaroid with a former prez, Carter will be signing copies of his new book on Oct. 28 at The King's English Bookshop near 1500 South and 1500 East in SLC.

Fore!

Here's my comment in last Sunday's Daily Herald regarding Provo's golf course.

They only give you 100 words on those things. Not much to make yourself sound very intelligent. I thought the Herald's Op-Ed "Is City Owned Golf a Sand Trap?" on the topic did a fine job outlining the issues.

So. Should cities be involved in golf? Call me unprincipled but I say - it depends. I have nothing against a community pooling its resources to fund beneficial projects. It's just in this case East Bay Golf Course is unable to operate at a profit because they cannot raise their rates - why? Because the marketplace already has enough golf courses. It's supply and demand.

Other similar issues like say a rec center in Provo I'm open to because Provo doesn't have one, and the market is such that a private investor won't get a decent ROI. So if the citizens of Provo decide we want to build one that oh say - just breaks even, then I say let's go for it.

I guess that's why I'm a Republican and not a pure Libertarian.

Herbert Takes the Bait

The Trib's report on the 2nd gubernatorial debate indicates the dialogue was 'nasty.'

Most of the animosity seems to center around the I-15 bid "pay for play" scandal or lack thereof or whatever it is. The Corroon campaign is brilliantly running with this issue. And the reason why it's working is because the Herbert campaign is taking the bait! My question is why? Because now the issue has serious legs, the press is eating it up, and it's giving Corroon so much more air time than without.

Herbert should have just laid out the facts, opened up the records, dismissed it as an ongoing campaign issue and focus on the economy (stupid). But every time Corroon brings it up you can tell he's getting under Herbert's skin. Herbert can't help himself but respond - as if it's a personal attack on his integrity. Note to Gary - IT'S NOT - unless YOU make it so which you are doing. SO STOP!

Corroon Challenge

I know this is so last Thursday but I have to comment on the Corroon to Herbert Challenge.

Corroon challenged Governor Herbert to return any donations over $10,000. It's kind of a funny gimmick really. That would mean Herbert would have to return about $750,000 and Corroon $250,000. So let's face it. It ain't going to happen.

Should campaigns be limited in what money they can raise? Eh. I'm not against requiring some limits. I'm not sure what the numbers should be. Raising money is soooooo difficult. Limiting donation amounts can sometimes force campaigns to reallocate resources from communicating with voters to simply dialing for dollars. A quick example - say you need to raise oh $10,000. Right now, a (state) campaign could get that from one donor. But if the limit were $2,500 then the campaign's got to raise that from four different people. It's a lot more work.

And let me add, I do have serious concerns about limiting one's ability to speak with their wallets - read free speech concerns. Complex issues. I encourage the dialogue.

But the best part in whole back forth between Corroon and Herbert is the zinger delivered by Herbert campaign manager Joe Demma. In his response to "The Challenge" Demma throws it back in Corroon's face and says "If the Mayor has reservations about any of those donations and the influence they have on his ability to govern Salt Lake County, his commitment to returning them should not be contingent upon the governor."

Awesome. I love that. Yes, Mayor; If this is such a concern why are YOU taking donations over $10,000 in the first place? Nice call out by Demma.

Have you taken The Pledge?

Utah's own Congressman Chaffetz was among a dozen-ish Republican Congressmen to appear and speak at the unveiling of the House-GOP's "Pledge to America."

See the official link at Pledge.gop.gov

To me, I'm reminded of the ancient Roman flea standing atop the wheel of a chariot amidst a stir of dust who says "what a great storm we've incited this day!" (I think that's Cicero could be Pliny - can't remember).

I mean it just seems like a poof of dust. Tall on rhetoric short on new ideas. For example from the second page of the intro; An arrogant and out-of-touch government of self-appointed elites makes decisions, issues mandates, and enacts laws without accepting or requesting the input of the many. Classic campaign season blah blah blah.

Can't you just see lead Pledge author Rep Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) sitting at his writing table late into the night, writing by candle light, trying his best to channel his inner Thomas Jefferson...but for what? It's just all so...so...silly.

Try this one - Trust gets it's own section:

A PLAN TO REFORM CONGRESS & RESTORE TRUST

• We will “read the bill” and require legislation be publicly available at least 3 days before voting on it

• We will adhere to the Constitution and require every bill to cite its specific Constitutional Authority

• We will ensure an open and bipartisan debate on all spending bills

• We will advance legislative issues one at a time and end the practice of massive bills that address unrelated issues.

The ironic thing is I DON'T TRUST THE GOP TO DO THIS. It all sounds good, but will they really do it if they take control? Can they really do it? Rhetoric. All stuff that sounds good in an election then never happens. Sigh...

Side note.

Read the sidebar "Why Chaffetz" in the Trib article. I don't think the Tea Party folks would be very happy with the following: Chaffetz said congressional clout is partially based on relationships, and he has become fast friends with some of the leading Republicans in Washington. He said his speaking role “is an expression that they have gained a lot of confidence in me in a very short amount of time.”

I just don't know if Chaffetz can be trusted anymore now that he's so quickly made friends with the Washington elite. ;)

Provo Ethics

The Provo City Council announced it would not be ammending it's ethics rules. At play in this particular debate is the issue of conflicts of interest.

The current rules requre a councilmember to only declare their conflict. They are still free to debate, discuss, lobby, and even vote on the issue. To me, I have no problem with a councilmember declaring their interest - transparency is a good thing. Also, they should be free to lobby and debate their point of view. I'm fine with all of that as long as it's done in the open. My beef is with the final vote. Councilmembers should excuse themselves from voting on those issues in which they have a direct conflict of interest.

Do councilmembers have greater influence on their collegues? Of course they do, but I think it's unfair or unwise even to not allow them to contribute to the debate on issues they have personal interests in. But, they shouldn't vote. Let their ideas and arguments sway the members on the council. Not their own vote.

Good Lesson on Crisis Communications

I thought the Utah National Guard did well for itself by admitting they had made a mistake and taking full responsibility for the Herriman/Machine Gun Fire incident. Maj. Gen. Brian Tarbet said it was the Guard's mistake to shoot under the existing weather conditions.

Its refreshing in a way to see a public/government/military organization take responsibility so quickly. I've found that more damage to credibility, trust, and reputation tends to be done in the cover-up and spin of explanation than just flat out admitting the truth right away.

So for such an awful event it's nice to see the Guard own up to it's mistake.

Where in the UTCO-World is Mayor Corroon?

So I get it that Utah County is exactly a hot bed of support for the Corroon for Gov campaign, but I can't recall hearing about any campaign events in Utah County. I wouldn't spend a ton of time down here either, but you can't completely ignore Utah County. Richard Davis must be pulling his hair out. Just sayin...you know...Richard Davis must be pulling his hair out.

And to tag along on that note, just for fun; Can you tell me what's different between the campaign logo above versus the one below? And I'm not talking "Mayor" v. "Governor." There's something the Corroon Campaign isn't emphasizing in the statewide race.

International House of...Politics?

You've heard of "pancakes and politics" right? You know, when candidates buy delegates/would-be voters breakfast?

Just when I was about to launch my own IHOP version; a world-wide political think tank/non-profit/save-the-world/its-all-about-the-kids foundation... the lawyers go and get in the way!

IHOP (the pancake maker) sues IHOP (the prayer center) over trademark

...back to the drawing board err...test kitchen...whatever...

Next Stop. Havana?

Cuba is reforming their economic system. As one of the last few communist holdouts its amazing really it's lasted this long.

One gem from the Cuban statement: "Our state cannot and should not continue supporting businesses, production entities and services with inflated payrolls," the union said, "and losses that hurt our economy are ultimately counterproductive, creating bad habits and distorting worker conduct."

Well duh.

I've always thought the travel and trade restrictions to Cuba are silly. They are a remnant of the Cold War and should be abolished. The White House as recently as last month has indicated they may move to lift the restrictions. With any luck we could all be relaxing on a Cuban beach a year from now.

Who's in?

To Report or Not Report. That is the...

I was a bit surprised to see this piece from Paul Rolly of the Trib.

It's an article regarding the Florida pastor who wanted to burn the Koran. Interestingly, Paul in this case argues that there are some stories the press should not report. It's insightful and spot on.

If a tree falls in the forest...

Civility, Politics, Media, and the Truth

I wanted to jot down a couple thoughts regarding the new media policy from KSL, which is "taking a stand for civility in political advertising."

"What we'd like to do is try to help candidates focus on what they stand for rather than tear down their opponent," Willes said (Deseret Media Companies CEO).

Okay. Who can argue with that?

Essentially, what they are trying to do is come up with some kind of "truth test" according to the statement. I think they will have a hard time really blocking any ads because most ads (if not all) are based in some form of the truth. I would challenge anyone to produce an example of an out and out lying political ad. Show me one without some element of truth to it.

When I worked on the Cannon campaign we were often frustrated by what we felt were "lies" about the Congressman's record for example. The reality is what our opponent(s) were saying were not necessarily lies but elements of the truth somewhat twisted or taken out of context to further advance their arguments. Were our opponents out and out lying? No. They weren't. My experience is that most candidates are able to justify what they are saying to some degree or another.

When candidates challenge their opponents directly some think that is negative. I believe it is important to allow candidates to directly and frankly point out their differences. But let them be fair and honest in outlining their differences. Let them not conveniently ignore certain unflattering facts. Let them confront them honestly and directly. We deserve it.

What we really need is not civility in politics but intellectual honesty. What most people would call "negative" ads are generally not personal attacks, but distorted elements of the truth. The line between that and a lie is admittedly thin. What our political speech needs is less rehtoric and more honest examination of the facts in full context. The challenge becomes the ability to fully flesh out an issue in a 20 second radio spot or direct mail post card.

My advice if the media is really trying to clean up campaigns (should that even be their role?) is to challenge candidates more openly, loudly, in your face, on the out and out exaggerations, twisting facts, out of context comments, and yes, be intellectually honest themselves void of agenda. You know, honest journalism. If KSL is going to block an ad let them do it publically not by preventing it's airing in the first place but challenging it so loudly the candidate will be forced to defend and here's that word again - justify it.

So what do I really think about KLS's new policy? Its misguided and naive. In the end it will have little if any effect on campaigns in Utah.

Update 9/15/2010: For a current real life example take a look at the sausage grinder's blog regarding Morgan Philpot's claim that Matheson has only passed two bills. How quickly each camp gets into the minutia. Also take a look at the comments - they just prove my point and are what inspired this update.

Congressman Ryan...I like it.

Congressman Ryan. No. It's not what you think. I came across this great Washington Post article profiling Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI). When I was in DC I secretly admired Congressman Ryan from afar. Probably because we have so much in common. He's smart. He's young. He's good looking. ;) And in an institution of poll fearing policy making and cheap sound bites he's the real deal.

When I run for Congress (wink) I want to run on the Ryan platform. Seems like a natural thing to do right? But really, what's not to like about this guy? His views particularly on budget items just ring common sense to me.

One of the biggest problems with our nation's debt problem is funding the entitlement programs such as social security, medicare and medicaid. Congressman Ryan (I just like saying that) wants to implement private insurance options in the place of government run programs. On Social Security he says why not allow those under 55 to put their social security tax payments into personal accounts? Really? Yeah really! This is one that absolutely drives me crazy! I know my money would grow more in a private account than sitting in the government treasury...but that's all for another day.

What's endearing about Congressman Ryan (don't you like the sound of that too?) is this line: "Political people always tell their candidates to stay away from controversy," said Ryan, 40. "They say, 'Don't propose anything new or bold because the other side will use it against you.' (Think Congressman Rob Bishop here - don't propose anything new or bold - you won't get anything done, but you won't get voted out either).

We need more people who lead with real vision, passion, and common sense. And given the silliness of the recent Senate Primary the following quote from the article is also timely:

"It's really important, I think, not to run campaigns on some vague platitudes and rip down the other party, to hopefully win an election by default," he said. "You have to win an election by acclamation, by aspiration, by telling people who you are and what you are going to do, and then go do it once you get there."

So yeah, Congressman Ryan. I like the sound of it.

If you are feeling policy-wonkish check out the Ryan platform here.

The List

As some of you may know an anonymous letter was sent out to various state leaders and Departments over the last few days including a list of 1300 supposed undocumented immigrants. To me The List represents everything wrong with the immigration debate.

It smacks of the infamous McCarthy 'Black List'- those who were suspected Communists. The link above highlights the state's review of how The List was obtained. The fact that it was submitted anonymously is not only cowardly but (to use the word again) smacks of secret police tactics.

I'm always reluctant to publicly refer to my church experience in Romania, but one thing I came back with was a determination to never let what happened there during Ceausescu's reign to ever happen here. Neighbors spying on neighbors. People living in fear of being awakened in the middle of the night and never being heard from again. Persecuted, accused, tortured, killed. Often with little evidence other than what a terrified neighbor thought they heard or saw.

What if your name is on the list? What if you simply share the same name as someone on The List? Your neighbors, with (apparently) access to state databases, the compilers of The List presume you are guilty. Should your workplace be raided? Should you be dragged in front of law enforcement, investigators, or committees? It's happened before. And we don't have to look to examples from the former Eastern Block, but our own history and the McCarthy hearings of the 1950s.

One of my favorite Congressional hearing exchanges of all time occurred on June 9th 1954 between the head counsel for the US Army Joseph Welch and Senator Joseph McCarthy (both pictured above). Take a moment and watch it here. It was the 30th day of the infamous McCarthy hearings. Mr. Welch was defending a young Army lawyer who's only apparent act of treason was that he had joined a lawyers guild. It was Mr. Welch who publicly stood up to Senator McCarthy with his famous line "Have you no sense of decency sir?"

Learn more about this unsung American hero and a short transcript of the exchange here.

When I first heard about The List I was reminded of Mr. Welch's statement. To those who thought it was a good idea to take the law into their own hands, publish names, addresses, due dates of pregnant mothers in some cases, phone numbers, social security numbers, I would ask them Have you no sense of decency sir? Who are you to play judge and jury?

This is America where you are considered innocent until proven guilty.

Update: See Peg McEntee's article "List a Dispicable sign McCarthyism could happen here. Similar arguments but better presented by Peg.

Don't Rain on MY Parade Provo

Does this seem ironic to anyone else? The Provo "Freedom" Festival Parade has had a years long policy of only allowing elected officials to officially be in the parade - excluding challenging opponents. You can see the Desnews article regarding Congressional Candidate Karen Hyer's argument for why she should be allowed to participate here.

I'll be supporting Congressman Chaffetz so this particular race isn't the issue for me. The issue is - It's the FREEDOM Festival for crying out loud! Why not let any and all challengers in? Free and fair elections is key to what makes us free. Why not celebrate that? Why be exclusive? I can't think of another city or community-based parade that refuses to allow challengers (maybe the Days of 47?) to walk and wave and kiss as many babies as possible along the way.

Come on Provo. Let them in!

I guess some parades are more free than others.

I HATE this line...

from a story about the Bridgewater Lee KUED debate:

"I think one of the things the people of Utah want is someone who won't vacillate, who won't waiver..."

Is it ever okay for an elected official or candidate to change their mind?

I don't want to get into who said it and what the issue was that the other person supposedly shifted on. The reason I hate this is because politicians and the media are constantly putting themselves and our public officials in boxes.

Ideologues are quick to cry that a person is "unprincipled" if they change positions. Reporters cry hypocrisy if someone changes their mind. Have YOU ever changed your mind on an issue? Of course you have. New information, evolving dialogue, etc... "Sides" of an issue are not created in a vacuum. It's also fair to say that on some issues there are no formal sides - you may not be for or against - but what if you are somewhere in between? or mostly on one "side" but differ on a few of the details?

This is the political culture of our day. Both in DC and at home. This is part of the reason why people are so frustrated with politics. Surely our elected officials need to be held accountable for what they say. I'm simply saying let's not be so quick to cry hypocrite or heresy when someone changes their mind.

Issues are important. They are also complex. In many cases I think people need time to make up their mind. Let's allow our elected officials to make the best decisions they can with out making mimes out of them.

Mike Throw's a Football...on TV

Senate candidate Mike Lee is the first to go up on TV. You can see the ad here. You can see the Desnews breakdown here. Up to this point both candidates have run ho hum radio ads - sort of a tit for tat rushed production I think to see who could be the first up on the air. Neither spot was really that compelling.

And I don't think Mike's TV spot is very compelling either. I feel like both campaigns are bit a patronizing in a way. Mike's ad starts off with "Stop the Obama liberal agenda." I don't like those sorts of broad strokes. They are kind of lazy in my mind. Granted this is his first TV spot and it's basically an introduction and bio ad to help voters get to know him, but it's short on real solutions. I think Mike needs to hit harder on specifics.

Tim's "Stop the DC Insanity" campaign is gimmicky and I think frankly a little silly for a US Senate race - a House seat maybe. And even then a House seat in Mississippi or Arkansas somewhere. But the message is the right one. I think people are less motivated by fear of Obama and the "liberal" agenda, than a simple overwhelming frustration with DC. If Mike tries to run against the democrats, Obama, and Liberals, basically - "I'm the most conservative" - I think he loses. Bob Bennett is conservative and he already lost.

The winner will be the one who makes the better case of why we need to change the culture in DC. So while DC Insanity is gimmicky it's the right message.

And because I can't resist:

Note to Mike. If you throw like a girl don't put yourself in a commercial throwing a football. Try something else to show how American you are - like grilling red meat on the 4th of July.

Post Script to Mike: Something I wanted to add earlier but forgot - if the campaign ever comes down to Tim Businessman v Mike Lawyer. Businessman wins everytime.

Is it any Wonder?

Interesting PEW poll finds 4 of 5 don't trust DC.

Is anyone really surprised?

The poll says that "results point to 'a perfect storm' of public unrest, Pew reports, "a dismal economy (check), an unhappy public (check), bitter, partisan-based backlash (check) and epic discontent with Congress (check) and elected officials (and check)."

So, check, check, check, check, and check.

-Beware I'm about to wax philosophical here-

When you think about it, its interesting how much people are targeting their elected officials. I think that most of the trouble actually lies in the institutions themselves and elected officials happen to be the face of those institutions.

Our nation's institutions as intentionally created by the Founders were designed to be cumbersome and slow. Take Congress for example; Name a successful company that goes through TWO huge decision making bodies with complicated subsystems (committees, hearings, floor debate, ect) then goes to the CEO for final approval? Not too many of those around.

Changing anything in Washington is really like making sausage. It's ugly. I think herein lies the real frustration of most Americans. We feel powerless to really make a difference - to "change" anything. Every two/six years we (often) send new people back with promises of change to the same bodies with little capability to effectively change anything.

Take a look at this list of Presidential Slogans dating back to 1840. It's interesting to see how many of those really focused on change. So I'm not sure changing the people really changes anything in what really are unchangeable institutions unless those people are changing what it is we are asking those institutions to do.

Whew! I just wrote that last sentence and I'm not sure I even follow it.

He's BaaAAAck....

So it's been a long time since I last posted. I stopped blogging when Utah County GOP Chair, Taylor Oldroyd asked me to be on the UTCO Steering Committee. I felt it was just too difficult to blog and still maintain a sense of neutrality among the various elected officials, initiatives, and candidates. So I took a break.

A little over a month ago I realized I was just too busy with family, work, and everything else to really be useful and effective on the Steering Committee so I resigned. I really did enjoy serving on the SC. The SC had some real lively discussion and it was a great opportunity to have influence on the direction of the county party. There really is a diversity of ideas on the Committee which I think is a good thing.

I'm looking forward to blogging a bit more regularly again. So for the two people who occasionally read this blog before - Thanks

Thoughts on the senate race so far

So the Trib ran its obligatory Bennett (insert any incumbent really) outspends their opponents article this morning. You can see it here: Bennett spends 20 times his opponents.

I think people over estimate the role money plays in campaigns - especially the media. They love those stories. Don't get me wrong, marketing budgets are a huge part of a campaign's success. But Jason Chaffetz proved that you don't need big bucks to win.

For me the most interesting sentence in the whole article is the last from Kirk Jowers director of the Hinckley Institute of Politics: "The bigger problem for candidates like Eagar and Lee is that their message has been so tailored to the far right that it may not appeal to mainstream Republicans."

I know I'm from Utah County so I'm supposed to like Mike Lee - and I do - a lot. But right now I'm kind of leaning Tim Bridgewater. Although I have some concerns I don't worry too much about electing a candidate that is too far out of the mainstream. But for me as a partner in a small business Tim's message of knowing what it's like to make a payroll really resonates with me.

In a recent Forbes article the SBA announced that 30% of all small businesses fail in the first two years - 50% within five. I don't get the sense that Lee, Bennett, certainly not Eagar understand or fully appreciate how hard it is to run a small business. And really, small and medium sized businesses are what fuel job creation.

At this point in the campaign it seems like all of the GOP challengers are on board with a return to conservative/constitutional principles. I'm looking for something that further distinguishes them though, and right now Tim's story and message are leading the pack for me.

Anyhow, those are just a collection of thoughts I have as a state delegate at this stage in the convention process. Stay tuned...